Category Archives: Articles

Dissed by Santa, So Suggesting Resolutions Instead

by Cathy Brooks

Even though I’m pretty sure there isn’t actually a portly old dude in a red suit who slips down chimneys with presents, I wished pretty hard for something this Christmas.

It didn’t come.

Okay, so I’m Jewish and maybe that had something to do with the fact that Santa blew me off, but to be honest the problem isn’t what didn’t come … it’s what did and, as with all holiday merchandising, it started early.

It was about a week before Thanksgiving when the flood, really more like a tsunami, began – pitches, pitches and more pitches all seeking to set up a meeting with me at the Consumer Electronics Show. Here’s the thing, it was glaringly obviously that not a single one of them had taken a moment to even glance at the writing I do. If they had, they’d have seen that not only do I not review products, I don’t write about technology really at all. Okay, so I write about how technology impacts our lives from a social and operational basis, and I may talk about products that I use personally but even a cursory glance at anything I write - whether via a social media platform, blog or even radio – shows quite clearly that pitches proclaiming the latest release from pioneering-trailblazing-industry leading-superduperproductmojo company and asking to “schedule a meeting in booth XXXX to see the product” just aren’t a fit.

Here’s the problem. Every last one of these pitches was a mass mail, clearly a cut and paste of a generic pitch blasted out to the entire press list for CES. (Disclosure: I’m registered as media for CES 2010 through my involvement with the Intel Insider program.) In spite of the bulk mailing, most of them attempted to be jovial, overly personal and – in at least one case – almost inappropriately familiar in language, as if we were life-long buddies.

Now to be fair, I have worked on the PR side of the fence and know all-too-well the ferocious challenge of heading to a massive trade show with a client (or more than one client) tasked with the responsibility of securing press briefings. That is why every single pitch I received, yes every single one, got a personalized response that read something like this:

Dear XXXX,

First off, thank you for sending your pitch. I appreciate your outreach, and understand the Herculean task of scheduling press meetings that you face. That said, if you had taken a quick look at my work, or even just done a quick Google search on my name, you’d see that I don’t review products and don’t write about product or company news. What does interest me, though, is the way in which technology is impacting our lives, changing behaviors and that sort of thing. In other words – it’s not about the tools, it’s about what we do with them that I care about. If, with this information, you have a more targeted reason for why we should meet, then I’m all ears. If not, I wish you the best of luck with CES and a Happy New Year.

Best,

Cathy

That was nice, right? I mean, I can’t very well complain about people not giving me pitches that are a fit if I don’t give them some guidance, so I thought I’d use the opportunity as a teaching moment.

My mistake.

While there were a few thoughtful and grateful replies (none of which provided a more targeted pitch I should add), more than a few of the responses I got to my replies were, put simply, nothing short of an embarrassment for the communications industry. The responses ranged from snarky to downright rude. Some people were nasty. Some people failed to answer my questions or address my suggestions at all. In several cases, it was almost as though they were merely plodding through their pitching script having been told if their first pitch was rejected here is the thing to say.

Bad choice.

Like I said, the need for communications people to mass pitch large numbers of press and bloggers at major events is nothing new, but the sloppy manner in which such a massive number of communications people seem to feel it’s appropriate to achieve that goal was, put simply, shocking to me. I mean COME ON PEOPLE, shouldn’t we know better by now? Has no one been paying attention? In the last year countless things have been written – including a stellar view on how public relations has changed by Brian Solis – cajoling, educating and otherwise crying out for the communications industry to get with the program and realize that the world has changed – and that means adjusting processes and protocols that have been in place for years.

Yes, I realize that is tough, but at the same time there are any number of stellar communications professionals and agencies that firmly grasp the changes and are stepping carefully and resolutely down the path towards improving the way in which they leverage technology to do their jobs. As one example I hold up Edelman Digital as a group that really seems to “get it”. It doesn’t hurt that one of the leaders in the charge for that firm is Steve Rubel - a talented communications professional who spends ample time himself wandering the digital hallways of social media to keep his own perspectives fresh.

For the record, I also realize many of those pitching me were probably the low persons on the proverbial agency totem pole – junior account people with little experience who were tossed into the fray with little guidance. To those agencies who did this I say shame on you! By failing to mentor or teach your junior staff, you are perpetuating the problem. Hopefully along the way these junior staffers will have media and bloggers who provide constructive feedback as I did, but more often than not those pitches will either go ignored or – if they catch someone on a bad day – may result in their being flamed or verbally eviscerated. I know, because back in the day I was one of those hapless young folks and I recall quite clearly one conversation with a now very well-known writer (he was just starting out at the time) who ripped me a new one for “wasting my valuable time with a worthless conversation.”

Ouch. But you know what? I never did it again.

So while Santa didn’t heed my plea to staunch the flood of relatively worthless pitches, I’m proffering a clarion call to communications people for the New Year with my list of resolutions to consider. I’m avoiding a top 10 list, and not even offering 5, figuring that by giving only three hopefully people will adopt at least one:

1) If you’re doing a mass mail pitch – call it one: We ‘re not stupid. We know you have to toss lots of stuff at the wall for big events. So just call a spade a spade. Don’t try to be cute, funny or overly personal with people you don’t know.

2) Be prepared to go deeper: If someone does reply to your generic pitch and asks questions – answer them. More than likely it’ll pay off.

3) Do your homework: Okay so perhaps this one should be first and should actually preclude a mass mail, but taking a step back and doing some research on people will never steer you wrong.

Image Source: Shutterstock

The reports of newspapers’ death are (perhaps) greatly exaggerated

Guest post by Cathy Brooks


Source: Shutterstock

I admit it. I’m old fashioned. That may seem a silly statement coming from someone as deeply steeped in the digital realm as I, but when it comes to certain things this Silicon Valley geek likes to roll old school. I believe in charcoal barbecues. I believe in hand-writing thank you notes. I believe that white shoes have no business being worn after Labor Day. Most of all though, and to the great amusement of many I know, I believe in daily newspapers.

So when someone started to steal my New York Times off the front step of my building, I did what any self-respecting social media person would do. I launched an aggressive effort to catch the SOB, and began to chronicle my efforts in streaming video.

After a couple of weeks of on and off success in at least getting my paper but failing to snare the culprit I escalated my efforts, as I explain in this video:

Day after day I arose far earlier than my non-morning person self cared to, and I waited. Through the process I got to know many neighbors – those in my building as well as various and sundry folks whose morning schedules took them past my stakeout perch. I realized that every morning more than a half dozen newspapers landed on the step of my building alone. I saw similar stacks of newsprint on other stoops. I saw myriad people walking dogs and striding purposefully towards bus stops – many of them also with broadsheets in hand.

When it came to that daily paper fix, clearly I wasn’t alone.

Then there were my online comrades. Besides the amusement several people seemed to get from my daily commentary, I found a growing chorus of support from folks on Twitter and Facebook. People shared my self-righteous indignation at the theft. That surprised me less than the passionate support that many shared for getting that daily slab of printed paper to complement their morning coffee. Most people felt I should just set up a streaming web cam and save myself the burden of getting up so darn early. Others suggested setting a booby trap for the culprit. Still others offered to come and sit in shifts to help me snare the thief. Then came a note from Chris O’Brien, a friend and long-time Journalist who writes for the San Jose Mercury News. His suggestion? My videos would make a great ad campaign for the newspaper industry.

Some might say that an ad campaign for the newspaper industry would be a waste of time. After all, why waste effort for an industry that, according to statistics, is on the decline? Seeing Chris’ name in my comment stream, however, reminded me that in addition to his being a dyed-in-the-wool member of the Fourth Estate, he had an up-close-and-personal perspective that maybe, just maybe things weren’t so bleak after all.

After a bit of calendar choreography, Chris and I managed to settle in for a phone chat one afternoon last week. Over the course of about a half hour, we wended our way through a discussion from which I gleaned several key points:

1) Newsprint may be black and white but the media business isn’t – While people tend to lean towards a twofold viewpoint (the world was this way, now it’s that way; people used to do things this way, now people do things another way), the truth is that the advent of new forms of media have yet to wholly kill previous forms. Television didn’t kill radio. The VCR didn’t kill the movies. Okay so maybe the Internet struck a near fatal blow to the music industry, but even in that case, things continue to evolve. In Chris’ words, “People want to get into a binary debate that we used to just all want (the newspaper) because we had no choice and now people want the raw feed to mix up their own news. From where I sit what’s really happening is that people have splintered in a lot of different directions. You still have people who value the gatekeeper/passive experience at one end and then you have (people on the other end) who just want the raw feed of all data washing over them, but mostly people exist on the span in between.”

2) Never underestimate the power of human nature - The people who get newspapers in print tend to be committed to getting the product in that form and whether it’s habit or not, they tend to stick with getting that paper delivered to their doorstep. O’Brien related that when the Seattle Post-Intelligencer ceased publishing its print edition and went web only, thanks to a joint operating agreement all P-I subscribers were switched automatically to the only remaining Seattle daily – The Seattle Times. People had the option to cancel, but something interesting happened. They didn’t. Not only did they retain their existing subscriptions, but when those began to run out, almost everyone renewed. O’Brien is not surprised by this and spoke of the digitally saturated people with whom he speaks every day – the venture capitalists and tech company executives whose lives are shackled to Blackberries and RSS feeds. “These are people who use technology for everything in their lives and they still get the paper in print. They still have it delivered to their doorstep.”

3) In today’s rapidly moving world, tactile yet passive experiences have merit - One of my favorite things about that morning paper is, quite simply, turning the pages. Humans are, after all, kinesthetic creatures, so the hands-on experience of a paper has some value. O’Brien agrees with that, and thinks that there’s something even more simple. Sometimes people just want a “psychologically different experience … a purely passive experience.” He went on to explain that oftentimes people don’t want “something with buttons or to click around. Even with a Kindle, there are buttons to push and that’s not appealing to them. They just want something that’s there. Something they don’t have to think about.” There are some who disagree with that perspective, but I’m not one of them.

What does all of this mean? From where I sit, it’s pretty clear newspapers aren’t going away. While some may enjoy the macabre view of a deathwatch, the truth is that this is all about evolution; and as these things go, it’s not about today – it’s about what and who is coming across the horizon.

For starters, there are myriad efforts to revitalize and retool newsrooms and O’Brien has done more than dabble on this front. Awarded a grant from the Knight Foundation, O’Brien tackled the task of building a next generation newsroom for Duke University. His “Next Newsroom” project, included the development of a site on which to archive his research and create a conversation around the task of designing this newsroom of the future. Though the official part of the grant ended in 2008, the Ning network he created lives on – and is thriving. In addition, in spite of the bleak industry outlook, the numbers for Journalism programs across the US proffer a glimmer of hope – they’re on the rise.

Are these monumental steps that will swoop in and save the anemic newspaper industry? No. They do, however, represent positive movement in a necessary evolution – an evolution that will no doubt lead to a new kind of newspaper for a new kind of audience.

As for me and my newspaper thief – the problem has been resolved. No, I haven’t found the culprit (though I did narrow down the potential suspects to one of eight residents in my building). Instead, my newspaper delivery man has adapted. Rather than whizzing by my house and winging the paper out of the open window of his car, this fine fellow stops his car, and physically hides the paper for me every morning.

Besides the guarantee that this great service will keep me as a subscriber, you can be sure I’ll be giving him a nice present for the holidays.

Please also read, “Can the statusphere save journalists?”

Darwin’s theory: Survival of the (conference) fittest

Guest post by Cathy Brooks, read her blog | follow her on Twitter


Credit

The tech industry cannibalizes its own young quite well – at least when it comes to conferences.

You know what I’m talking about. Any time there’s a hot topic, a battery of conferences and events spring to life, all purporting to be the end all be all source for information on that given subject.

These new market, technology or product focused voices join the steady ongoing chorus of stalwart general events – the panoply of high-end confabs targeting in-demand leaders from top brands and companies. From TED and PopTech to AllThingsD and Web 2.0 Summit, each of these executive-level (usually C-suite focused) forums trumpets its respective cast list (speakers and attendees), showing that their event will be the destination for decision makers making news; and that’s only in the US. Add to the mix gatherings like DLD and LeWeb and you begin to see that it’s easy to get confused.

For anyone who knows me even just a little bit, you may be chuckling at this point – chuckling because I’m one of those people who consumes far more than your average bear’s worth of conference fodder. In fact, I’m often asked, “Why on earth do you attend all these conferences? What do you get out of them?”

Besides having a truly deep fascination with and enjoyment of people watching, I find that if you peer beyond the degree of obvious overlap, each of the tech events – even the seeming duplicates – differ just enough to provide unique value.

Why does this matter?

Last week I met a fellow who’s embarking on a big community-outreach oriented project. He knows that social media will play a critical role in the development, execution and likely the success of this endeavor; and since he’s confessed to having a somewhat troglodytic perspective on these things, I was there to help. Well, at this point, mostly just to talk.

Our conversation skated the spectrum – from the basic premise of why integrating social media is important to some very specific discussion of tools and tactics. Then we got to the subject of conferences – specifically the series of events coming up in LA, both of which herald their value as being a deeper engagement with, understanding of and participation in “the real-time web”.

Such as it is now with events focused on Web 2.0 darling, Twitter.

To try and count every gathering, conference, seminar, workshop or meet-up tackling some angle of Twitter, would be folly. This is not an attempt to create the ultimate Twitter event resource list, rather it’s an exercise to remind us all that while in fact all five of those blind men do see the elephant accurately, it’s the compilation of their perspectives that brings true reality to life.

With that, I’m focusing solely on the events I see as rising to the fore as substantive gatherings. The three of which I speak are: The Twitter Conference, by Parnassus Group; Jeff Pulver’s The 140 Character Conference; and TWTRCON, co-produced by Tonia Ries and Gina Smith.

My objective here is simple: to shed some light on the unique aspects of each event, and in doing so, show how the aggregate reality of all three is where the true power lies.

DISCLOSURE: I attended two of these three events (missed the first Twitter Conference in Mountain View, CA due to travel). I helped emcee at The 140 Character Conference in New York, and have been invited to present at the upcoming 140 Character Conference in LA. However, I have no official relationship – monetary or otherwise – with Jeff Pulver or any of the other organizers or their events. Brian Solis has spoken at all three events and has hosted three different discussions correlating with the premise of each show.

For the record these are listed in the order in which they come up on calendars:

The Twitter Conference:
The tagline on the home page for the conference bills the event as: “the place where developers, business people, and enthusiasts converge to find innovative ways to tap into the Real-Time Web.” When you click through to the speaker list every person is either a Hollywood or Internet celebrity; or they’re a developer/staffer at Twitter. Above and beyond all else, though, this thing is about Twitter. Period. Whether it’s playing to the Hollywood geography and attending to the celebrity angle or a lot of deep geeking out on development of the platform and applications for it – The Twitter Conference is just that – a conference about Twitter.

I spoke with Steve Broback, founder of Parnassus Group and one of the organizers behind this event, and he was straight up in telling me that they “are not hedging bets” in trying to address all of the real time Web.

He said, “(There are other events in this space) and their angle is ‘who knows what Twitter will be’ in five years. We’re not doing that. We’re betting that while there are other real-time Web platforms, that Twitter will be it … and (we) are creating the event that Twitter would create if they had the time.”

I’d planned to go to this conference because the topic of celebrity as impacted by the world of social media fascinates me. I’m curious to hear from celebrities how they are leveraging the platform of Twitter to lower or remove the velvet rope between them and their fans. I’m also keen to see which of them are just posers and which are truly using the technology. Though I’m far from a coder, I am also curious to see what the company may have up its sleeve with regards to new applications, new platform direction – all that geeky stuff.

Steve was emphatic on the point of timing, saying it is an important part of their positioning that theirs was “the very first conference with Twitter in its name, focused wholly on this platform.”

He went on to say, however, that he does feel there’s room in the sandbox for everyone. “In the old days (of conference producing) if you were first to market you’d crowd out the competition.” In continuing he explained that the differentiators between the various events, as well as the changed landscape of event production overall in the bad economy allows more space in the market for more players to engage.

The pricing set for this gathering is, as Steve described, in keeping with the feel of Twitter, and targeted to end users and developers with a series of keynotes and panel discussions addressing an array of topics.

140 Character Conference:
With the name being “140 Character” of course the preponderance of discussions relate to Twitter as a platform, but also incorporates a wider landscape view with discussions being less about the technology and more about the way that it’s being used and the social impact that results.

There is some celebrity quotient as well with several Hollywood people on the roster. The bulk of the program, though, focuses on people from major brands, government entities, private business and just plain old regular folks (including a homeless man) who are finding ways to use the real-time Web as part of their lives.

I’d planned to attend this conference for several reasons, not the least of which is that as someone who advises clients as to the best ways to leverage real-time technologies, there will be ample case studies of interest. In addition the expansion beyond the world of Silicon Valley to other businesses and industries means that this conference does its best to get outside of the echo chamber that is so normally a Silicon Valley event (geeks talking with and to geeks about geeky things).

The event’s producer, Jeff Pulver, said that his conference’s focus on the real-time Web had a Twitter flavor “for now” because “in 2009 Twitter is … the platform we use … the language we speak, but it is not expected to be the only language or platform of the future.”

He continued: “I’m trying (to avoid) being the place where people will be on stage singing the praise of Twitter and where people will talk about tips and techniques … To the extent that Twitter has helped bring about change that change is what we will discuss.”

The 140 Character Conference also is marked by densely packed program and rapid-fire presentation format. There will be more than 120 speakers on the stage over two days in a combination of individual talks (10 minutes each), keynotes (15 minutes) and panels (20-40 minutes depending on the topic).

Pricing is a bit steeper, but as Jeff explained, “This event is being priced and marketed to the executives in the Entertainment and Media industries responsible for dealing with the change and the opportunity the emergence of these underlying technologies represent.”

TWTRCON:
Right out of the gate, TWTRCON differs from the prior two events listed by its format. Rather than two days, TWTRCON’s organizers produce a single-day program that delivers a very focused set of case studies and discussions around real-world implementations of Twitter for business. In talking with Tonia Ries, Founder & CEO, Modern Media Partners and co-host of TWTRCON, she referred to a recent blog post by Robert Scoble, in which he says that Twitter is underhyped as a business tool. Tonia agrees.

“Where the power of Twitter is being felt in many ways, in a way that I think is very sustainable and will shape the long term, is in the business applications,” she said. “Our mission from the beginning was to bring in the people who are actually using Twitter in a business context – for whatever application – bring those case studies to life and talk about some of the challenges and best practices around that.”

The next foray for TWTRCON is in Washington, DC on October 22 and Tonia explained that in addition to the business cases studies, this event includes non-profits, foundations and possibly a look at policy and government issues. I’m hoping to go, but frankly for me it’s a travel thing. (I’m going to be far more familiar with the inside of my suitcase over the next couple of months than I’d already like, and am pretty sure that should I expand that time away Truman will ensure the destruction of my cowboy boot collection.)

My interest in this gathering hinges squarely on the great experience I had at their first go-round in San Francisco. There the conversations were, as billed, a focused discussion of real-world implementations as told by the people who are doing the work. There was one panel, masterfully moderated by Kara Swisher, on which some of the Twitterverse/Social Media realm’s influential voices did their thing, but TWTRCON clearly drew the line between celebrity and practical use focusing its content on how this stuff can and does work.

Tonia explained these events clearly represent the stage at which our use of this and other real time web technologies currently sit.  “Twitter is a simple tool to use, but the business applications around it are incredibly complicated. They range from things like having complete transparency – do you allow employees to Twitter and talk about work-related issues? … what about when your executives Twitter?  … where do you connect personal brands with business brands? –  these issues are brand new. They’ve been bubbling under the surface with social media for a while, but Twitter is completely public and (completely real time), it brings issues to a point where businesses can no longer ignore them. And that’s what we wanted to build a conference around.”

In conclusion – if there is one – it’s that every one of these events brings its own level of value to an audience. Will there be overlap in attendees, of course, but given the clear distinctions set out by the organizers, the overlap should be minimal, and so there should be room in the sandbox for all.

Online Reputation and Brand Management Starts with Identity

As I’ve written over the years, in the era of the Social Web, we are all brand managers. While I spend a significant portion of my time sharing the importance of listening and observing to noteworthy conversations and the enveloping cultures that define relevant online communities. When it comes to participation and engagement however, identity is often an afterthought by most companies.

Knowem is a new service that help businesses take a proactive step to securing their brand and product identities across the Conversation Prism a.k.a. the social Web to expedite their foray into Social Media or to retain the domains as assets for future Social Media programs. Think GoDaddy for Social Networks IDs.

Knowem serves two functions. First, it provides you with the ability to quickly search over 120 popular social networks for the availability of any username. The results and status are immediately displayed next to each network. Second, Knowem helps brand managers secure the available identities through a time-saving service that acquires all available domains for a one time fee of $64.95. For an additional $9.95 per month, they will also continue to monitor new websites and register your username on them as soon as they launch.

I a big believer in creating and participating in the communities where discussions are relevant to your brand and marketplace. Conversations occuring today in one ore more networks will eventually augment or shift altogether as new networks are introduced or existing sites gain favor. Having a service that automatically acquires important usernames as they emerge seems trivial at $9.95 when compared to the investment required to promote a new identity because it wasn’t available.

According to the founders, some of the biggest brands in the world have yet to obtain their identities in multiple networks. For example, Google (NASDAQ:GOOG), Pepsi (NYSE:PEP), Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Exxon (NYSE:XOM) and Citigroup (NYSE:C) still show that dozens, and in some cases over 80%, of popular social media websites still list their brand names as available.

Knowem also ran searches for popular celebrities and learned that many have not yet secured their online identity either. Ashton Kutcher and Oprah Winfrey’s recent exposure in the media for their use of Twitter has spotlighted and sparked celebrity enthusiasm for using social media as a channel for publicity, communication, and TMI. But as of today, their Twitter screen names, @aplusk and @oprah, are still both available on almost 90% of other sites that may prove important in future social media programs.

Brand and reputation management is now a systematic process in our daily routine of listening, learning, and participating. We ARE responsible for our personal brand as well as the corporate brand we represent. Securing that online brand and investing in and cultivating an impeccable and influential reputation is critical to establishing and maintaining a consistent, strategic, and complementary presence from network to network. It’s not just about what’s popular today, but ultimately engaging where your communities are congregating. Maintaining a portfolio of consistent usernames provides a seamless ability to effectively navigate the Social Web as one cohesive brand, where and when opportunities emerge.

Helpful Posts on PR 2.0:

- The Social OS, The Battle Between Facebook and Twitter is the New Mac vs. PC
- The Domino’s Effect
- The Conversation Index
- A New Search Engine for Twitter
- Social Media Influences Buying Decisions
- Can The Statusphere Save Journalism?
- Is Social Media Recession Proof?
- Facebook Now 200 Million Strong
- Twitter Traffic Surges to 10 Million
- The End of the Innocence
- The Social Effect
- Putting the Public Back in Public Relations is Now Available
- Twitter and Social Networks Usher in a New Era of Social CRM
- The Human Network = The Social Economy
- In the Statusphere, ADD Creates Opportunities for Collaboration and Education
- Humanizing Social Networks, Revealing the People Powering Social Media
- Social Networks Now More Popular than Email; Facebook Surpasses MySpace
- Are Blogs Losing Authority to the Statusphere?
- I Like You The Emerging Culture of Micro Acts of Appreciation
- The Ties that Bind Us - Visualizing Relationships on Twitter and Social Networks
- Make Tweet Love – Top Tips for Building Twitter Relationships
- The Battle for Your Social Status
- Twitter Tools for Communication and Community Professionals
- Is Twitter a Viable Conversation Platform

Connect with me on:
Twitter, FriendFeed, LinkedIn, Tumblr, Plaxo, Plurk, Identi.ca, BackType, Social Median, or Facebook

Subscribe to the PR 2.0 RSS feed.


Now available:



Start Slide Show with PicLens Lite PicLens

PR in the face of Web 2.0 and social media

In Part I, I stated that all things 2 dot oh were now the cattle call heard round the world for marketers to update their service menu, increase prices, and start offering a brand new, shiny set of new media services - most at the expense of the companies they represent.

Click here to check out this PR Social Media Article.

The entrepreneur’s guide to social media

Adding social media to your marketing strategy isn’t just an option anymore, it’s a necessity for most businesses. Companies such as Coca-Cola, Churchill Downs and even presidential hopeful Senator Barack Obama are all using social media to promote their brand.

Click here to view this social media article.

Business gets on board with social media sites

For information on Kimberly-Clark Corp. and its many paper brands, consumers could visit the company Web site or search the company on a plethora of social media sites.

Click here to view this article.

50 social sites that every business needs a presence on

If your business limits its online presence to advertising banners and blogging, it’s missing out. The Internet provides powerful networking opportunities that allow users to effectively target their audience by logging on to social sites like LinkedIn, Digg and more.

Click here to view this article.

Are social networking sites useful for business?

Social networking online seems to be exploding: Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Digg, and so on. When I ask how these sites can help my business, the answers can be vague.

Click here to view this Article.

Why social media is worth small business owners’ time

YouTube. Flickr. Digg. Metacafe. Stumbleupon. Technorati. Del.icio.us. Kaboodle. Fark. Furl. Swik. Mixx. Are social media tools like these the future or simply new ways to waste time? Can’t we slow this train down?

Click Here to read this full article.